I Watched Every Thornwick Ramblers Game and Have Several Pointed Questions for Their Analytics Team
The Ramblers' AI coordinator made decisions that would make a concussed safety look like a Rhodes Scholar.
Rex Holloway
Senior Columnist
Look, I've been around football my entire life. Played linebacker for sixteen years, suffered enough concussions to make the CDC nervous, and I've never—and I mean *never*—seen a team move the chains with the strategic coherence of a GPS unit that's actively having a stroke.
The Thornwick Ramblers this season were something special. Not good special. I'm talking about watching a team that apparently hired their AI coordinator from the clearance rack at a Best Buy going-out-of-business sale.
Let me lay out what I observed across their fifteen-game schedule. In Game 3, Thornwick faced a crucial third-and-four on the opponent's 32-yard line, down by six with 2:47 left in the fourth quarter. The analytics said: go for it. Fine. I get it. Expected value theory. But here's where I have questions—genuine, pointed questions for whoever programmed this thing: why did the play call involve a jet sweep to a linebacker? A *linebacker*. I've seen offensive coordinators with literal brain damage make better calls while actually being concussed.
The algorithm wasn't finished cooking. In Game 7, Thornwick inexplicably punted on second down. Second. Down. When I asked their head coach about it afterward, he just shrugged and said, "The model predicted a 73% probability that not punting would result in negative yards." Sir, that's not how football works. That's how a machine learning system works when it's been trained exclusively on highlight reels from a league made up entirely of players with the decision-making skills of sedated goldfish.
By Game 12, I stopped trying to rationalize it. Thornwick attempted a flea flicker on first down with a six-point lead in the third quarter. They have no wide receivers who can run that route. They threw it directly to a safety. The color commentator just screamed. I screamed. A guy in Row J screamed. We all understood we were witnessing a team being piloted by something that understood the *concept* of football the way a chatbot understands philosophy—technically literate, spiritually void.
The defensive schemes were somehow worse. In Game 9, Thornwick lined up in cover-zero (all-out blitz, zero safeties deep) on third-and-long from their own red zone. Third. And. Long. From the *red zone*. The opposing quarterback threw a go route past everyone—nobody home. Touchdown.
Here's what kills me: the organization actually *bragged* about their AI decision-making system in the preseason. "Data-driven," they called it. "Revolutionary." The only thing revolutionary was watching an algorithm discover new and creative ways to lose football games.
I've seen plenty of bad football. Bad coaching, bad talent, bad luck. But watching Thornwick was watching someone's Python script have an existential crisis in real time, and that crisis was playing cornerback.
The Ramblers finished 4-11. That's probably generous.
Rex Holloway
Senior Columnist
Former linebacker. Now professional opinion-haver. Rex turned down three retirement packages to keep writing. Nobody asked him to.
More from Rex Holloway
Column
Why Very.Football Is The Only Football That Matters Anymore (And Real NFL Fans Know It)
Column
The Thornwick Ramblers Made Me Question Everything I Know About Football (And Possibly My Life Choices)
Column
The Terrordome Rankings: Which Very.Football Stadium Will Literally End You
Column
The Terrifying Octagon: Ranking Every Very.Football Stadium by Sheer Atmospheric Dread